Hello Everyone, The gram below was intended to be sent on Saturday, but I could not get it out from the hotel. I was very frustrated about that! Sorry. First, I must say that I had it wrong. The BNR is not published until THIS week. Sorry about that. However, I can report that the editor said that we will probably have a color 691/701 on the front page. Still no guarantee, but probably. Marcus did ask the editor for permission to distribute the 691/701 article here, but David Harper asked us not to do that. I guess that we should be flattered that the BNR could consider the MPC Gram to be competition!! Thanks for trying Marcus. Delayed gram starts below. This is also remote gram #1. It is being sent while I am in Chicago. Actually, I guess we did this once before where Marcus and/or Doug sent out a gram for me while I was on the road somewhere. Anyway, hopefully, you receive this gram on Saturday. Chat on Thursday included an interesting concept. Someone was talking about boarder notes. Sorry, I do not remember who brought it up and used that term. Someone help me on that. Anyway, the concept being discussed there was to find the last note of a prinitng and the first note of the next printing. This would apply only to series with multiple printings. Boy, I can go on about this for a long time!! I don't think that we have discussed this in the gram, but I have discussed with many of you the possiblity of finding the last note of a given issue. This is actually more rare (in collections) than serial number 1 notes. At the time of manufacturing of course they are equally rare (and both unique for each issue). However, the number ones got saved (in at least some cases) whereas any last numbers that survive are probably by simple chance. Rare, rare, rare and a treasure hunting goldmine. Fiding the border notes would be simply an extension of the above. Well, I have yet another twist. I would like to find ANY two consecutive serial numbers from different positions! A very good example applying to any denomiation would be SN 00008000 (position 1) and 00008001 (position 2). Any such pair would be wonderful in demonstrating the sheet numbering concept that is so important and causes so much difficulty. The above example may be the most desirable because of the low numbers, but a great pair (for any fractional MPC) would be 00672000 and 00672001. Do you need to ask profski what the position numbers would be? Think for a moment. They would be 84 and 1 repectively. They would be the last note from unit one and the first from the second unit. The word unit is a little confusin, profski (and Ray Toy too) insists on using the word run, but I do not like that. I prefer the word unit which is the word used in BEP documents. However, profski, I must admit that the documents to not use it in exaclty the same sense that we collectors use it. Someone can and will find some pairs like this. Phil is a good candidate because of the way that he digs! We sure need some pairs like these to illustrate in the MPC book to help people understand the concept! Thanks for bringing this up in chat and let's go find some pairs! I received the Lyn Knight Currency [sic] Auctions catalog for the Memphis sale. Wow, what a catalog, color throughout. It is surprising that it does not include any MPC, but it does include some exciting military notes. Most notably a Series 1934 North Africa $10 (CU). This is a very rare note indeed. Knight says and I agree that it is probably the rarest non-star small size note. Of course the star version of the same note is unique. We will certainly examine these notes, watch the sale, and report on the results. I expect that the Smythe auction will include some MPC, but I do not have any advance word on that. Have a great day. Fred ===== --------------------------------- please respond to this address or to fred@papermoneyworld.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/